Wednesday, March 28, 2007
Thursday, March 15, 2007
Supporting (Some) Of The Troops

I'm reminded of two WWII veterans I met while working at a small White Plains Law Firm several years ago. They were both members of segregated black units that were not, until nearly the end of the war, permitted to engage in combat. Instead, they did maintenance; support tasks; one was even a member of a travelling military baseball team. Aside from obvious equality and fairness issues, preventing people from specific groups from fully serving their countries also prevents those groups from having the kinds of heroes and legacies upon which every community draws pride from. Schools, roads, and monuments are erected to honor those who've served, who gave their lives to protect our country. These acts of public recognition become part of the formal and informal history of our country. We can point to the people who defended us, and we laud them and the values they represent. And rightfully so. Our gay soldiers deserve no less.
Wednesday, March 14, 2007
Too Late

Monday, March 12, 2007
Fun With Captions

Sadly, no other network dared take on the threat of El Queda.
Thursday, March 08, 2007
Wednesday, March 07, 2007
80% Guilty or 20% Not Guilty
Larry, why do you hate freedom?If a President can be impeached for lying about a blow job then by God a Vice President should be impeached for setting in motion the forces that destroyed an intelligence network during a time of war.
Tuesday, March 06, 2007
Girly Men and Manly Women
The underlying premise of the modern conservative movement is that the entire Democratic party consists of a bunch of fags and dykes who are both too effeminate and too masculine to properly lead the nation. Coulter says it out loud. Dowd hints at it broadly. And the entire press corps giggles and swoons at this shallow, sophomoric concept like a bunch of junior high pom pom girls.
The converse of this is equally true. As critical as it is to them to feminize Democratic and liberal males (and to masculinize the women), even more important is to create false images of masculine power and strength around their authority figures. The reality of this masculine power is almost always non-existent. The imagery is what counts.
Ronald Reagan never got anywhere near the military war (claiming eyesight difficulties to avoid deployment in World War II), and he spent his life as a Hollywood actor, not a rancher, yet to this day, conservatives swoon over his masculine role-playing as though he is some sort of super-brave military hero. Meanwhile, Jimmy Carter, who actually graduated the Naval Academy and was assigned to real live nuclear submarines, is mocked as a weak and snivelling coward who should not have a ship named after him.
And the ultimate expression of faux, empty, masculine courage and power is, of course, the Commander-in-Chief himself -- the Glorious Leader whom John Podhoretz hailed in the title of his worshippful cult book as The First Great Leader of the 21st Century -- with the ranch hats and brush-clearing pants and flight-suit outfits that would make the Village People seethe with jealousy over his costume choices ...
Orcinus adds:
The "edgy" hate talk that she has been pushing for some time now especially appeals to the frat-boy level of sophistication that is her intended audience, and this latest iteration is all about justifying the new bigotry. Coulter's underlying logic is simple: Bigots are just people with different ideas, not hateful misanthropes whose beliefs are innately poisonous.
Our very manly leader: